← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan Patrick Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-04-05 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Philadelphia Rebels NAHL 59 10 22 32 0.542 0.1993 0.1956 0.5725 0.5618
2017-18 Philadelphia Rebels NAHL 59 22 26 48 0.814 0.2989 0.2785 0.8588 0.8003
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Stevenson D3 MAC SR 26 10 16 26 1.000
2020-21 Stevenson D1 MAC JR 16 4 13 17 1.062
2020-21 Stevenson D3 MAC JR 16 4 13 17 1.062
2019-20 Stevenson D1 MAC SO 26 7 23 30 1.154
2019-20 Stevenson D3 MAC SO 26 7 23 30 1.154
2018-19 Stevenson D1 MAC FR 25 3 12 15 0.600
2018-19 Stevenson D3 MAC FR 25 3 12 15 0.600
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.60
2018-19 · Stevenson
+185.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

52%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
35%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17758
Forward overall
#785
Forward born in 1997
#1017
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Salve Regina · 2023-24
1.385 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Endicott · 2024-25
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stout · 2023-24
0.739 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.