IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Wyatt Schingoethe Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-08-03 Country: USA
2020 · Round 7, Pick #195  ·  Toronto Maple Leafs Toronto Maple Leafs
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Waterloo Black Hawks USHL 62 11 22 33 0.532 0.3140 0.3503 1.5987 1.7833
2019-20 Waterloo Black Hawks USHL 47 17 21 38 0.808 0.4769 0.4769 2.4282 2.4282
2020-21 Waterloo Black Hawks USHL 44 10 11 21 0.477 0.2816 0.2816 1.4335 1.4335
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Western Michigan D1 NCHC SR 31 5 6 11 0.355
2023-24 Western Michigan D1 NCHC JR 24 0 4 4 0.167
2022-23 Western Michigan D1 NCHC SO 9 1 1 2 0.222
2021-22 Western Michigan D1 NCHC FR 20 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

75%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
25%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#11134
Forward overall
#540
Forward born in 2002
#1002
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Anders Bjork
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Average
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Larkin
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.49 PPG
→ Michigan (1.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.38 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Gambrell
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Denver (1.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Chris Wilkie
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Joe Wegwerth
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Gage Dill
Curry · 2018-19
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Bloom
University of New England · 2010-11
1.654 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Paul Rodrigues
SUNY Oswego · 2007-08
0.893 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.