← New Search ↗ Social Card

Matt Hanewall Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-01-02 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 NAHL 42 5 5 10 0.238 0.0884 0.0900 0.2521 0.2568
2017-18 Janesville Jets NAHL 58 7 16 23 0.397 0.1473 0.1427 0.4199 0.4069
2018-19 Janesville Jets NAHL 59 20 16 36 0.610 0.2266 0.2095 0.6461 0.5972
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 NCHA SR 23 10 11 21 0.913
2021-22 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 NCHA JR 24 15 11 26 1.083
2020-21 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 SO 19 4 7 11 0.579
2019-20 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 FR 22 13 6 19 0.864
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.86
2019-20 · Milwaukee School of Engineering
+451.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
68%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#24385
Forward overall
#999
Forward born in 1998
#2618
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.02 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Brockport · 2024-25
0.792 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Endicott · 2015-16
0.533 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Salve Regina · 2014-15
0.630 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.