← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ben Schoen Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-05-18 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Youngstown Phantoms USHL 55 6 22 28 0.509 0.3129 0.3457 1.4999 1.6574
2019-20 Youngstown Phantoms USHL 29 6 14 20 0.690 0.4240 0.4240 2.0320 2.0320
2020-21 USHL 41 17 13 30 0.732 0.4498 0.4498 2.1557 2.1557
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Penn State D1 BigTen SR 37 2 11 13 0.351
2024-25 Penn State D1 BigTen SR 37 7 13 20 0.540
2023-24 Penn State D1 BigTen JR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 Penn State D1 BigTen SO 24 3 12 15 0.625
2021-22 Penn State D1 BigTen FR 37 6 16 22 0.595
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.30
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.59
2021-22 · Penn State
+100.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

65%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
35%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8318
Forward overall
#391
Forward born in 2002
#706
in USHL

D1 Comparables

NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Boston College (0.76 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.54 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.74 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.59 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Minnesota
0.34 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

New England · 2017-18
1.667 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Curry · 2018-19
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Utica · 2016-17
0.864 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.