IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Peter Zhong Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-07-30 Country: USA
Signed Professionally
Shanghai Dragons · KHL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Philadelphia Rebels NAHL 34 3 1 4 0.118 0.0432 0.0452 0.1241 0.1299
2017-18 Philadelphia Rebels NAHL 32 1 1 2 0.062 0.0230 0.0229 0.0660 0.0658
2021-22 Shanghai Dragons KHL 7 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Arizona State D1 NCHC SO 4 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Arizona State D1 NCHC FR 11 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 Arizona State D1 NCHC — 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
85%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#60951
Forward overall
#3445
Forward born in 1998

D1 Comparables

Josh Erickson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ben Greiner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG
Conor Andrle
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Army (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Average
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Spezia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Matthew Hansen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Isaac Moberg
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2018-19
0.182 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Sutton Murray
Buffalo State · 2022-23
0.296 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Luke Veitch
Johnson & Wales · 2012-13
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.