IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Joe Nagle Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1999-05-17 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Northeast Generals NAHL 12 0 2 2 0.167 0.0612 0.0665 0.1760 0.1913
2017-18 Northeast Generals NAHL 51 1 10 11 0.216 0.0792 0.0822 0.2277 0.2362
2018-19 Northeast Generals NAHL 41 2 15 17 0.415 0.1523 0.1512 0.4376 0.4344
2019-20 — NAHL 51 3 21 24 0.471 0.1729 0.1729 0.4967 0.4967
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Norwich D3 LittleEast — 15 1 3 4 0.267
2022-23 Norwich D3 LittleEast — 29 3 16 19 0.655
2021-22 Norwich D3 LittleEast — 22 5 9 14 0.636
2020-21 New Hampshire D1 HockeyEast FR 7 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
30%
Age-Out / Club
28%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#9947
Defenseman overall
#1913
Defenseman born in 1999
#3523
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Dan Molenaar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
James Roll
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Victor Björkung
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Christopher Dienes
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Tucker Poolman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.44 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Derek Thorogood
Marian · 2012-13
0.518 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Karim Gayfullin
Curry · 2022-23
0.808 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Nicholas Bennett
Elmira · 2023-24
0.739 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.