IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Sam Dabrowski Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-08-12 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Coulee Region Chill NA3HL 6 2 1 3 0.500 0.0553 0.0603 0.1584 0.1728
2016-17 Coulee Region Chill NA3HL 46 21 26 47 1.022 0.1130 0.1176 — —
2017-18 Coulee Region Chill NAHL 56 5 9 14 0.250 0.0888 0.0888 0.2625 0.2624
2018-19 Chippewa Steel NAHL 13 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Hamline D3 MIAC SR 24 12 7 19 0.792
2021-22 Hamline D3 MIAC JR 25 3 4 7 0.280
2020-21 Hamline D1 — SO 6 0 1 1 0.167
2020-21 Hamline D3 MIAC SO 6 0 1 1 0.167
2019-20 Hamline D1 — FR 25 2 4 6 0.240
2019-20 Hamline D3 MIAC FR 25 2 4 6 0.240
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.24
2019-20 · Hamline
+179.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
78%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#45094
Forward overall
#2415
Forward born in 1998

D1 Comparables

Josh Erickson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Conor Andrle
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Army (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Greiner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG
Zach Saar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Penn State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Spezia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brandon Picard
Concordia (WI) · 2017-18
0.920 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Brett Moccia
Connecticut College · 2018-19
0.222 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Patrick Choi
Connecticut College · 2017-18
0.235 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.