← New Search ↗ Social Card

Evan Rochowiak Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-05-17 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Drumheller Dragons AJHL 36 4 5 9 0.250 0.0838 0.0857 0.2317 0.2369
2016-17 AJHL 48 10 16 26 0.542 0.1817 0.1770 0.5020 0.4889
2017-18 NAHL 75 21 23 44 0.587 0.2084 0.1954 0.6160 0.5776
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 UMass Boston D3 NEHC SR 12 0 3 3 0.250
2019-20 UMass Boston D1 NEHC SO 11 4 2 6 0.545
2019-20 UMass Boston D3 NEHC SO 11 4 2 6 0.545
2018-19 UMass Boston D1 NEHC FR 25 2 5 7 0.280
2018-19 UMass Boston D3 NEHC FR 25 2 5 7 0.280
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.28
2018-19 · UMass Boston
+73.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D1
20%
NCAA D2/D3
42%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#31035
Forward overall
#1440
Forward born in 1997

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

St. Scholastica · 2004-05
0.615 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Geneseo · 2005-06
0.615 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Augsburg · 2003-04
1.080 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.