← New Search ↗ Social Card

Quinn Green Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-01-28 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Amarillo Wranglers NAHL 2 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 Amarillo Wranglers NAHL 56 24 15 39 0.696 0.2474 0.2419 0.7312 0.7150
2019-20 Amarillo Wranglers NAHL 50 20 19 39 0.780 0.2771 0.2771 0.8189 0.8189
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 WIAC SR 28 5 19 24 0.857
2022-23 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 WIAC JR 24 14 13 27 1.125
2021-22 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 WIAC SO 30 9 5 14 0.467
2020-21 Alabama Huntsville D1 FR 19 3 3 6 0.316
2020-21 Alabama-Huntsville D1 FR 19 3 3 6 0.316
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.32
2020-21 · Alabama Huntsville
+52.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
15%
Age-Out / Club
40%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#16112
Forward overall
#759
Forward born in 1999
#831
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-River Falls · 2003-04
1.259 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Lake Forest · 2000-01
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Canton · 2014-15
0.957 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.