← New Search ↗ Social Card

Andrew Erwin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1999-11-30 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Hibbing/Chisholm High USHS-MN 24 1 4 5 0.208 0.0264 0.0287 0.0506 0.0550
2017-18 Shreveport Mudbugs NAHL 5 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 Shreveport Mudbugs NAHL 5 0 1 1 0.200 0.0735 0.0750 0.2111 0.2153
2019-20 Northern Manitoba Blizzard MJHL 23 0 3 3 0.130 0.0251 0.0251 0.0822 0.0822
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Hamline D3 MIAC SR 25 5 8 13 0.520
2021-22 Hamline D3 MIAC JR 26 3 6 9 0.346
2020-21 Hamline D1 MIAC SO 5 0 1 1 0.200
2020-21 Hamline D3 MIAC SO 5 0 1 1 0.200
2019-20 Hamline D1 MIAC FR 12 0 1 1 0.083
2019-20 Hamline D3 MIAC FR 12 0 1 1 0.083
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.05
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.08
2019-20 · Hamline
+56.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
20%
Age-Out / Club
62%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#24145
Defenseman overall
#3362
Defenseman born in 1999

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.07 PPG
→ Army (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Maine (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.04 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.02 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Aurora · 2015-16
0.435 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Plymouth State · 2014-15
0.318 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Adrian · 2011-12
0.476 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.