← New Search ↗ Social Card

Alec Lefave Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-11-05 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Northern Cyclones EHL 13 1 0 1 0.077 0.0165 0.0176 0.0377 0.0402
2014-15 Northern Cyclones EHL 43 13 16 29 0.674 0.1447 0.1475 0.3303 0.3368
2015-16 Northern Cyclones EHL 36 14 11 25 0.694 0.1490 0.1454 0.3400 0.3317
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast SR 25 1 6 7 0.280
2018-19 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast JR 24 3 2 5 0.208
2017-18 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast SO 24 7 3 10 0.417
2016-17 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast FR 22 1 6 7 0.318
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.32
2016-17 · Plymouth State
+154.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#34080
Forward overall
#1431
Forward born in 1995
#855
in EHL

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Army (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Geneseo · 2023-24
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Canton · 2023-24
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Castleton · 2009-10
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.