IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Hunter Svicki Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-11-06 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 King Rebellion OJHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2020-21 Toronto Patriots OJHL 0 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2021-22 Toronto Patriots OJHL 45 1 10 11 0.244 0.0683 0.0713 0.1687 0.1760
2022-23 — OJHL 42 1 11 12 0.286 0.0798 0.0792 0.1972 0.1957
2023-24 — OJHL 55 8 38 46 0.836 0.2337 0.2197 0.5772 0.5427
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Southern Maine D3 — SO 25 1 4 5 0.200
2024-25 Canton D3 SUNYAC FR 14 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D1
32%
NCAA D2/D3
28%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#28178
Forward overall
#1275
Forward born in 2003
#2463
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Doucet
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Erik Cooper
St. Norbert · 2011-12
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Michael Casale
Salem State · 2013-14
0.680 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Chase Decker
Norwich · 2002-03
0.455 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.