IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Bryce Howard Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-10-29 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Minnesota Wilderness NAHL 46 7 4 11 0.239 0.0888 0.0948 0.2532 0.2703
2022-23 — NAHL 33 4 7 11 0.333 0.1238 0.1261 0.3529 0.3594
2023-24 Oklahoma Warriors NAHL 30 3 6 9 0.300 0.1114 0.1081 0.3176 0.3083
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 SUNY Geneseo D3 — SO 1 0 1 1 1.000
2024-25 SUNY Geneseo D3 — FR 15 2 3 5 0.333
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2024-25 · SUNY Geneseo
+237.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

0%
NCAA D1
35%
NCAA D2/D3
62%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#24622
Forward overall
#1077
Forward born in 2003
#2670
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Nick DeCenzo
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Army (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Evan Ritt
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Denver
0.24 No data
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mike Hayward
SUNY Brockport · 2008-09
0.615 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jeff Zatorski
SUNY Potsdam · 2005-06
0.522 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Garrett Grimstad
Wisconsin-Stout · 2008-09
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.