← New Search ↗ Social Card

Colby Enns Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1999-09-16 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Minot Minotauros NAHL 13 2 1 3 0.231 0.0848 0.0936 0.2436 0.2689
2017-18 Minot Minotauros NAHL 58 9 18 27 0.466 0.1710 0.1803 0.4913 0.5180
2018-19 Central Illinois Flying Aces USHL 60 3 12 15 0.250 0.1475 0.1433 0.7509 0.7295
2019-20 Lincoln Stars USHL 24 3 10 13 0.542 0.3195 0.3195 1.6269 1.6269
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Merrimack D1 HockeyEast 30 0 4 4 0.133
2023-24 Northern Michigan D1 CCHA GR 28 1 3 4 0.143
2022-23 Northern Michigan D1 CCHA SR 32 1 5 6 0.188
2021-22 Northern Michigan D1 CCHA JR 2 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Northern Michigan D1 WCHA SO 26 3 2 5 0.192
2019-20 Nebraska Omaha D1 NCHC FR 1 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

55%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
18%
Age-Out / Club
20%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4839
Defenseman overall
#1104
Defenseman born in 1999

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ UConn (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Princeton (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Michigan Tech
0.05 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.07 PPG
→ Army (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Elmira · 2022-23
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Utica · 2008-09
0.769 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Geneseo · 2010-11
0.957 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.