← New Search ↗ Social Card

Chris Santiago Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1989-09-22 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2005-06 West Kelowna Warriors BCHL 53 5 7 12 0.226 0.0881 0.1008 0.3302 0.3779
2006-07 West Kelowna Warriors BCHL 58 21 17 38 0.655 0.2550 0.2781 0.9555 1.0422
2007-08 Victoria Grizzlies BCHL 52 7 10 17 0.327 0.1272 0.1319 0.4767 0.4942
2008-09 Surrey Eagles BCHL 52 16 33 49 0.942 0.3667 0.3648 1.3742 1.3671
2009-10 Surrey Eagles BCHL 55 20 23 43 0.782 0.3043 0.2861 1.1401 1.0719
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 Utica D3 UCHC SR 8 0 1 1 0.125
2012-13 Utica D3 UCHC JR 5 2 0 2 0.400
2011-12 Utica D3 SO 23 3 8 11 0.478
2010-11 Utica D3 FR 26 6 14 20 0.769
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.27
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.77
2010-11 · Utica
+183.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#11684
Forward overall
#457
Forward born in 1989
#921
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Sacred Heart (0.40 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Finlandia · 2003-04
1.478 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Superior · 2004-05
0.967 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2000-01
0.722 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.