IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Chris Santiago Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1989-09-22 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2005-06 West Kelowna Warriors BCHL 53 5 7 12 0.226 0.0872 0.0998 0.3295 0.3771
2006-07 West Kelowna Warriors BCHL 58 21 17 38 0.655 0.2524 0.2753 0.9535 1.0400
2007-08 Victoria Grizzlies BCHL 52 7 10 17 0.327 0.1260 0.1306 0.4757 0.4932
2008-09 Surrey Eagles BCHL 52 16 33 49 0.942 0.3631 0.3612 1.3713 1.3642
2009-10 Surrey Eagles BCHL 55 20 23 43 0.782 0.3012 0.2832 1.1378 1.0698
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 Utica D3 UCHC SR 8 0 1 1 0.125
2012-13 Utica D3 UCHC JR 5 2 0 2 0.400
2011-12 Utica D3 UCHC SO 23 3 8 11 0.478
2010-11 Utica D3 UCHC FR 26 6 14 20 0.769
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.27
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.77
2010-11 · Utica
+185.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#18937
Forward overall
#640
Forward born in 1989
#873
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sean Gaffney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
A.J. Reid
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Joe Lewis
Finlandia · 2003-04
1.478 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Russell Anderson
Utica · 2007-08
1.059 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Kris Heeres
SUNY Geneseo · 2001-02
1.042 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.