← New Search ↗ Social Card

Aaron Huglen Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-03-06 Country: USA
2019 NHL Draft Round 4, Pick #102  ·  Buffalo Sabres Buffalo Sabres
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Fargo Force USHL 28 4 10 14 0.500 0.3074 0.3212 1.4731 1.5394
2019-20 Fargo Force USHL 0 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Fargo Force USHL 39 15 20 35 0.897 0.5516 0.5516 2.6439 2.6439
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Minnesota D1 BigTen SR 38 5 14 19 0.500
2023-24 Minnesota D1 BigTen JR 37 13 8 21 0.568
2022-23 Minnesota D1 BigTen SO 38 7 10 17 0.447
2021-22 Minnesota D1 BigTen FR 37 7 9 16 0.432
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.27
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.43
2021-22 · Minnesota
+57.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

70%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
30%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6841
Forward overall
#275
Forward born in 2001
#526
in USHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Providence (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.62 PPG
→ Michigan (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.40 PPG
→ RPI (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Michigan (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

UMass Dartmouth · 2021-22
1.125 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Western New England · 2018-19
0.846 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
UMass Boston · 2014-15
1.125 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.