← New Search ↗ Social Card

Patrick Polino Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-04-11 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Chicago Steel USHL 3 0 1 1 0.333 0.2049 0.2249 0.9820 1.0780
2012-13 Chicago Steel USHL 60 9 15 24 0.400 0.2459 0.2568 1.1785 1.2310
2013-14 USHL 46 6 7 13 0.283 0.1737 0.1733 0.8326 0.8307
2014-15 Lincoln Stars USHL 60 15 18 33 0.550 0.3381 0.3207 1.6204 1.5371
2015-16 Lincoln Stars USHL 39 13 16 29 0.744 0.4571 0.4124 2.1908 1.9763
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 RPI D1 ECAC SR 34 11 8 19 0.559
2019-20 Rensselaer D1 SR 34 11 8 19 0.559
2018-19 RPI D1 ECAC JR 24 7 4 11 0.458
2018-19 Rensselaer D1 JR 24 7 4 11 0.458
2017-18 RPI D1 ECAC SO 36 2 9 11 0.306
2016-17 RPI D1 ECAC FR 37 4 7 11 0.297
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.32
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.30
2016-17 · RPI
-7.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#11364
Forward overall
#474
Forward born in 1995
#1090
in USHL

D1 Comparables

OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.52 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nichols · 2010-11
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stout · 2022-23
0.542 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2006-07
1.267 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.