IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Lewis Crosby Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-07-10 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Philadelphia Rebels NAHL 25 5 7 12 0.480 0.1764 0.1764 0.5066 0.5067
2019-20 — NAHL 52 12 9 21 0.404 0.1484 0.1484 0.4262 0.4262
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Saint John's D3 MIAC SR 20 3 9 12 0.600
2022-23 Saint John's D3 MIAC JR 26 7 15 22 0.846
2021-22 Saint John's D3 MIAC SO 27 17 6 23 0.852
2020-21 St. Thomas D3 CCHA FR 7 0 4 4 0.571
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.57
2020-21 · St. Thomas
+278.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
28%
Age-Out / Club
35%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#32410
Forward overall
#1735
Forward born in 1999
#3085
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Zach Saar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Penn State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Matt Pohlkamp
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Average
NCAAe PPG
Josh Erickson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Alfred Larsson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Spezia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Matt Rhymer
SUNY Potsdam · 2006-07
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Anthony Quatieri
Connecticut College · 2017-18
0.591 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Brayden Fryfogle
Canton · 2022-23
0.478 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.