IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Anthony Quatieri Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-06-28 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Northeast Generals NAHL 32 4 17 21 0.656 0.2411 0.2395 0.6926 0.6880
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Connecticut College D3 NESCAC — 24 6 6 12 0.500
2021-22 Connecticut College D3 NESCAC — 23 6 8 14 0.609
2019-20 Connecticut College D3 NESCAC — 25 4 13 17 0.680
2018-19 Connecticut College D3 NESCAC — 22 7 6 13 0.591
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.59
2018-19 · Connecticut College
+188.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

45%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
50%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10829
Forward overall
#488
Forward born in 1998
#296
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Alfred Larsson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Brett Skibba
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ UConn (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Zach Saar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Penn State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tanner Pond
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Matt Pohlkamp
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

John Williams
Curry · 2006-07
1.222 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Jaden Davis
Aurora · 2023-24
1.031 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Brendan Hull
Marian · 2005-06
0.852 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.