IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

George Vonakis Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-08-11 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Maryland Black Bears NAHL 19 2 2 4 0.210 0.0834 0.0838 0.2210 0.2220
2019-20 — EHL 45 9 30 39 0.867 0.3050 0.3050 0.4249 0.4249
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Curry D3 CNE GR 27 2 16 18 0.667
2023-24 Curry D3 CNE SR 26 4 11 15 0.577
2022-23 Curry D3 CNE JR 27 7 13 20 0.741
2021-22 Curry D3 CNE SO 22 0 11 11 0.500
2020-21 Curry D3 CNE FR 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
18%
Age-Out / Club
52%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#15452
Forward overall
#726
Forward born in 1999

D1 Comparables

Josh Erickson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Conor Andrle
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Army (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Greiner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Spezia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Zach Saar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Penn State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jordan Renaud
SUNY Brockport · 2016-17
0.591 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Dmitry Ermakov
Norwich · 2011-12
0.444 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Rory Gagnon
Hamilton · 2014-15
0.350 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.