IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Hayden Clark Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2000-03-24 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Soo Eagles NOJHL 33 7 12 19 0.576 0.0962 0.0977 0.2397 0.2434
2019-20 Soo Eagles NOJHL 54 4 29 33 0.611 0.1021 0.1021 0.2544 0.2544
2020-21 Northeast Generals NAHL 20 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Wisconsin-Stout D3 WIAC SO 4 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Wisconsin-Stout D3 WIAC FR 7 2 1 3 0.429
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.43
2021-22 · Wisconsin-Stout
+364.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
75%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#20935
Defenseman overall
#3090
Defenseman born in 2000

D1 Comparables

Zach Frye
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Justin Wade
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.10 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tim Davison
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
Dane Cooper
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Brown (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Chris Buchanan
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ Bentley (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

David Coyle
Castleton · 2022-23
0.731 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Brent Chandler
Marian · 2000-01
0.731 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Aidan Lyons
Bowdoin · 2021-22
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.