← New Search ↗ Social Card

Aidan Lyons Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-02-26 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Noble & Greenough NE-Prep 29 5 11 16 0.552 0.1064 0.1064 0.2525 0.2525
2019-20 Noble & Greenough NE-Prep 27 1 15 16 0.593 0.1143 0.1143 0.2712 0.2712
2021-22 Noble & Greenough NE-Prep 26 5 14 19 0.731 0.1410 0.1410 0.3344 0.3344
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Bowdoin D3 NESCAC SR 25 6 10 16 0.640
2024-25 Bowdoin D3 NESCAC JR 24 6 8 14 0.583
2023-24 Bowdoin D3 NESCAC SO 15 1 2 3 0.200
2022-23 Bowdoin D3 NESCAC FR 18 1 5 6 0.333
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2022-23 · Bowdoin
+171.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
57%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#7796
Defenseman overall
#1819
Defenseman born in 2003
#418
in NE-Prep

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Air Force (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.10 PPG
→ Air Force (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Hamline · 2014-15
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Nazareth · 2014-15
0.615 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2005-06
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.