IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Zach Yoder Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1994-08-14 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Muskegon Lumberjacks USHL 12 1 2 3 0.250 0.1592 0.1695 0.7492 0.7978
2012-13 Muskegon Lumberjacks USHL 29 0 3 3 0.103 0.0658 0.0666 0.3099 0.3135
2013-14 Janesville Jets NAHL 46 0 4 4 0.087 0.0323 0.0323 0.0921 0.0921
2014-15 Janesville Jets NAHL 58 4 20 24 0.414 0.1536 0.1456 0.4381 0.4152
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Ferris State D1 WCHA SR 35 4 7 11 0.314
2018-19 Ferris State D1 WCHA JR 27 0 4 4 0.148
2017-18 Ferris State D1 WCHA SO 36 1 5 6 0.167
2015-16 Air Force D1 AHA FR 29 1 8 9 0.310
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.31
2015-16 · Air Force
+227.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#13013
Defenseman overall
#1630
Defenseman born in 1994

D1 Comparables

Jake Flynn
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UConn (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Casey Nelson
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Carmine Taffo
Trine · 2016-17
0.261 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt Morin
Wisconsin-Stout · 2007-08
0.871 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Blair Falotico
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2009-10
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.