IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jake Bischoff Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1994-07-25 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Omaha Lancers USHL 10 0 1 1 0.100 0.0637 0.0677 0.2997 0.3183
2012-13 Omaha Lancers USHL 12 0 2 2 0.167 0.1062 0.1071 0.4995 0.5039
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Minnesota D1 BigTen SR 38 5 27 32 0.842
2015-16 Minnesota D1 BigTen JR 37 6 12 18 0.486
2014-15 Minnesota D1 BigTen SO 36 3 8 11 0.306
2013-14 Minnesota D1 BigTen FR 28 3 4 7 0.250
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.25
2013-14 · Minnesota
+190.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#13960
Defenseman overall
#1722
Defenseman born in 1994
#4025
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Jimmy Mazza
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Canisius (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Zach Yoder
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.10 PPG
→ Air Force (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.07 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Cutler Martin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Michigan (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Joseph Grabowski
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Princeton (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Chris Leibinger
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ryan Willett
Endicott · 2018-19
0.643 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Rob Johnson
St. Thomas · 2016-17
0.759 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Hunter Scanlon
UMass Dartmouth · 2021-22
0.611 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.