← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan Willett Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-07-27 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Corpus Christi IceRays NAHL 16 2 4 6 0.375 0.1392 0.1465 0.3971 0.4180
2019-20 P.A.L. Junior Islanders NCDC 49 23 22 45 0.918 0.2588 0.2588 0.7435 0.7435
2020-21 P.A.L. Junior Islanders NCDC 41 19 34 53 1.293 0.3643 0.3643 1.0466 1.0466
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Endicott D3 CNE SR 28 9 24 33 1.179
2023-24 Endicott D3 CNE JR 27 7 20 27 1.000
2022-23 Endicott D3 CNE SO 28 8 24 32 1.143
2021-22 Endicott D3 CNE FR 14 0 9 9 0.643
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.64
2021-22 · Endicott
+412.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
85%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#12025
Forward overall
#316
Forward born in 2000

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.44 PPG
→ Air Force (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.40 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.51 PPG
→ Air Force (0.09 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Worcester State · 2017-18
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Fredonia · 2001-02
0.957 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Utica · 2006-07
0.920 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.