IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan Willett Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-07-27 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Corpus Christi IceRays NAHL 16 2 4 6 0.375 0.1378 0.1451 0.3958 0.4166
2019-20 P.A.L. Junior Islanders NCDC 49 23 22 45 0.918 0.3744 0.3744 0.7382 0.7382
2020-21 P.A.L. Junior Islanders NCDC 41 19 34 53 1.293 0.5270 0.5270 1.0391 1.0391
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Endicott D3 CNE SR 28 9 24 33 1.179
2023-24 Endicott D3 CNE JR 27 7 20 27 1.000
2022-23 Endicott D3 CNE SO 28 8 24 32 1.143
2021-22 Endicott D3 CNE FR 14 0 9 9 0.643
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.64
2021-22 · Endicott
+417.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
82%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4423
Forward overall
#178
Forward born in 2000

D1 Comparables

Gage Torrel
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average
NCAAe PPG
Adam Johnson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.46 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jason Ford
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Nate Arentz
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Nikolas Olsson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Boston University (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ryan Edgar
Buffalo State · 2016-17
0.300 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Deiter Stange
Worcester State · 2017-18
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Neal Sheehan
Fredonia · 2001-02
0.957 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.