IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan Edgar Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-08-19 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 St. Louis Jr. Blues NA3HL 46 22 42 64 1.391 0.1746 0.1818 0.4392 0.4574
2017-18 Express Hockey Club EHL 44 15 31 46 1.046 0.2415 0.2449 0.5116 0.5189
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Buffalo State D1 SUNYAC SO 11 2 3 5 0.455
2019-20 Buffalo State D3 SUNYAC — 11 2 3 5 0.455
2018-19 Buffalo State D1 SUNYAC FR 20 4 2 6 0.300
2018-19 Buffalo State D3 SUNYAC — 20 4 2 6 0.300
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.30
2018-19 · Buffalo State
+59.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
68%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#12368
Forward overall
#562
Forward born in 1998

D1 Comparables

Jake Wood
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ RPI (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
C.J. Reuschlein
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ Army (0.67 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Max McHugh
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.88 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Judd Peterson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Kevin Irwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.56 PPG
→ Vermont (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brendan Darby
St. Olaf · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Michael Lamison
Chatham · 2017-18
0.520 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Alexei Filimonov
Fitchburg State · 2023-24
1.560 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.