IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Michael Lamison Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-08-20 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Southern Tier Xpress NA3HL 42 10 32 42 1.000 0.1255 0.1244 0.3157 0.3128
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Chatham D3 UCHC SR 25 4 15 19 0.760
2020-21 Chatham D1 UCHC JR 13 2 4 6 0.462
2020-21 Chatham D3 UCHC JR 13 2 4 6 0.462
2019-20 Chatham D1 UCHC SO 25 3 7 10 0.400
2019-20 Chatham D3 UCHC SO 25 3 7 10 0.400
2018-19 Chatham D1 UCHC FR 25 8 5 13 0.520
2018-19 Chatham D3 UCHC FR 25 8 5 13 0.520
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.52
2018-19 · Chatham
+388.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
88%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#23992
Forward overall
#1160
Forward born in 1998
#622
in NA3HL

D1 Comparables

Conor Andrle
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Army (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Average
NCAAe PPG
Josh Erickson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jake Wood
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ RPI (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ben Greiner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG
Zach Saar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Penn State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ryan Edgar
Buffalo State · 2017-18
0.300 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Alex Walker
UMass Dartmouth · 2023-24
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Greg Diamond
SUNY Geneseo · 2023-24
0.518 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.