IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Michael Lamison Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-08-20 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Southern Tier Xpress NA3HL 42 10 32 42 1.000 0.1205 0.1194 0.3159 0.3130
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Chatham D3 UCHC SR 25 4 15 19 0.760
2020-21 Chatham D3 UCHC JR 13 2 4 6 0.462
2019-20 Chatham D3 UCHC SO 25 3 7 10 0.400
2018-19 Chatham D3 UCHC FR 25 8 5 13 0.520
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.52
2018-19 · Chatham
+408.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
88%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#33429
Forward overall
#1447
Forward born in 1998
#765
in NA3HL

D1 Comparables

Conor Andrle
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Army (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Average
NCAAe PPG
Conor Lemirande
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Miami (0.08 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Erik Baskin
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.44 PPG
→ Air Force (0.66 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Ben Greiner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG
Zach Szajner
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Timmy Kent
Curry · 2018-19
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Alex Walker
UMass Dartmouth · 2023-24
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Greg Diamond
SUNY Geneseo · 2023-24
0.518 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.