IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Zander Allen Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-07-08 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 New Hampshire Jr. Monarchs USPHL-Elite 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2015-16 New England Wolves |EHLP / Elite| EHLP 40 16 35 51 1.275 0.1462 0.1484 0.2874 0.2917
2016-17 New England Wolves EHL 44 4 10 14 0.318 0.0735 0.0745 0.1557 0.1579
2017-18 New England Wolves EHL 50 7 17 24 0.480 0.1109 0.1063 0.2349 0.2251
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Framingham State D1 MASCAC FR 25 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 Framingham State D3 MASCAC — 25 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#33997
Forward overall
#1608
Forward born in 1997

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Schuyler Flansburg
SUNY Brockport · 2022-23
0.353 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
RJay Berra
SUNY Oswego · 2010-11
0.200 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Chad Thompson
Lake Forest · 2004-05
0.714 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.