← New Search ↗ Social Card

Schuyler Flansburg Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-07-10 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Connecticut Jr. Rangers NCDC 45 7 9 16 0.356 0.1450 0.1450 0.2858 0.2858
2020-21 Connecticut Jr. Rangers NCDC 28 2 6 8 0.286 0.1165 0.1165 0.2296 0.2296
2021-22 Connecticut Jr. Rangers NCDC 49 12 24 36 0.735 0.2995 0.2992 0.5906 0.5899
2022-23 Connecticut Jr. Rangers NCDC 47 13 17 30 0.638 0.2602 0.2490
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 SUNY Brockport D3 SUNYAC JR 26 8 3 11 0.423
2024-25 SUNY Brockport D3 SUNYAC SO 24 5 2 7 0.292
2023-24 SUNY Brockport D3 SUNYAC FR 17 4 2 6 0.353
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.23
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.35
2023-24 · SUNY Brockport
+53.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#11489
Forward overall
#556
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

University of New England · 2016-17
0.714 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2003-04
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Stevenson · 2018-19
0.731 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.