IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brian Miller Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-09-10 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 New Jersey Jr. Titans EHL 35 8 11 19 0.543 0.1910 0.2028 0.2662 0.2827
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Nazareth D1 — SR 28 2 15 17 0.607
2019-20 Nazareth D3 UCHC SR 28 2 15 17 0.607
2018-19 Nazareth D1 — JR 28 5 12 17 0.607
2018-19 Nazareth D3 UCHC JR 28 5 12 17 0.607
2017-18 Nazareth D3 UCHC SO 21 6 5 11 0.524
2016-17 Nazareth D3 UCHC FR 13 4 4 8 0.615
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.62
2016-17 · Nazareth
+254.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#29615
Forward overall
#1232
Forward born in 1996
#921
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Thomas Ebbing
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Michigan (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Kyle Osterberg
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.77 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Zach Aston-Reese
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Fitzgerald
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.12 PPG
→ Boston College (0.72 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Ian Mansfield
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Army (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ryan Romeo
SUNY Brockport · 2014-15
0.350 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ben Gamache
Hobart · 2009-10
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Frank Rizzo
SUNY Cortland · 2003-04
0.733 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.