← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan Romeo Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1996-09-28 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Jersey Hitmen USPHL-Elite 42 8 26 34 0.809 0.0747 0.0787 0.1854 0.1954
2015-16 New Hampshire Jr. Monarchs EHL 37 0 12 12 0.324 0.0749 0.0764 0.1587 0.1619
2016-17 New Hampshire Jr. Monarchs EHL 47 5 17 22 0.468 0.1081 0.1054 0.2290 0.2233
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 SUNY Brockport D3 SUNYAC 27 12 25 37 1.370
2019-20 Brockport D1 JR 24 10 16 26 1.083
2019-20 SUNY Brockport D3 SUNYAC JR 24 10 16 26 1.083
2018-19 Brockport D1 SO 26 4 13 17 0.654
2018-19 SUNY Brockport D3 SUNYAC SO 26 4 13 17 0.654
2017-18 SUNY Brockport D3 SUNYAC FR 20 2 5 7 0.350
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.35
2017-18 · SUNY Brockport
+295.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#11567
Defenseman overall
#1664
Defenseman born in 1996

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Post · 2024-25
0.222 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2014-15
0.375 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Worcester State · 2002-03
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.