IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan Romeo Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1996-09-28 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Jersey Hitmen USPHL-Elite 42 8 26 34 0.809 0.1422 0.1499 0.1855 0.1955
2015-16 New Hampshire Jr. Monarchs EHL 37 0 12 12 0.324 0.1141 0.1164 0.1590 0.1623
2016-17 New Hampshire Jr. Monarchs EHL 47 5 17 22 0.468 0.1647 0.1606 0.2295 0.2238
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 SUNY Brockport D3 SUNYAC — 27 12 25 37 1.370
2019-20 Brockport D1 — JR 24 10 16 26 1.083
2019-20 SUNY Brockport D3 — JR 24 10 16 26 1.083
2018-19 Brockport D1 — SO 26 4 13 17 0.654
2018-19 SUNY Brockport D3 — SO 26 4 13 17 0.654
2017-18 SUNY Brockport D3 — FR 20 2 5 7 0.350
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.35
2017-18 · SUNY Brockport
+159.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#11290
Defenseman overall
#1649
Defenseman born in 1996

D1 Comparables

Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Benjamin Gallacher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.18 No data
NCAAe PPG
Nolan Valleau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Michael Thomas
Colby · 2017-18
0.417 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Bill Walsh
Worcester State · 2002-03
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Gorbett
Franklin Pierce · 2017-18
0.304 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.