← New Search ↗ Social Card

Bill Walsh Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1982-10-07 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2000-01 Yorkton Terriers SJHL 6 0 0 0 0.000
2001-02 Dauphin Kings MJHL 55 8 20 28 0.509 0.1384 0.1361 0.3208 0.3155
2002-03 Dauphin Kings MJHL 63 7 28 35 0.556 0.1511 0.1425 0.3501 0.3302
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2006-07 Worcester State D3 SO 5 0 0 0 0.000
2005-06 Worcester State D3 FR 15 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#11059
Defenseman overall
#908
Defenseman born in 1982

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.18 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

UMass Boston · 2011-12
0.577 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wentworth · 2016-17
0.389 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Middlebury · 2008-09
0.222 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.