| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000-01 | Yorkton Terriers | SJHL | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | — | — | — | — |
| 2001-02 | Dauphin Kings | MJHL | 55 | 8 | 20 | 28 | 0.509 | 0.1384 | 0.1361 | 0.3208 | 0.3155 |
| 2002-03 | Dauphin Kings | MJHL | 63 | 7 | 28 | 35 | 0.556 | 0.1511 | 0.1425 | 0.3501 | 0.3302 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006-07 | Worcester State | D3 | — | SO | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 |
| 2005-06 | Worcester State | D3 | — | FR | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.