IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jack Arnold Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-10-12 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Moorhead USHS-MN 14 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2021-22 Moorhead USHS-MN 17 0 2 2 0.118 0.0145 0.0145 0.0286 0.0286
2022-23 Moorhead USHS-MN 30 2 6 8 0.267 0.0329 0.0329 0.0648 0.0648
2023-24 New Mexico Ice Wolves NA3HL 41 14 15 29 0.707 0.0782 0.0786 0.2241 0.2253
2024-25 New Mexico Ice Wolves NA3HL 36 6 24 30 0.833 0.0922 0.0879 0.2640 0.2517
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Concordia D3 MIAC — 1 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
2%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10093
Defenseman overall
#2191
Defenseman born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
Nolan Valleau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nick Redmon
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2015-16
0.417 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Will Rassier
Wesleyan · 2024-25
0.214 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Wyatt Trumbley
Westfield State · 2014-15
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.