← New Search ↗ Social Card

Hayden Taylor Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-05-18 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Philadelphia Jr. Flyers EHL 48 24 13 37 0.771 0.1128 0.1192 0.3779 0.3994
2017-18 Islanders Hockey Club NCDC 48 18 22 40 0.833 0.1926 0.1915 0.6738 0.6700
2018-19 Lone Star Brahmas NAHL 16 1 1 2 0.125 0.0444 0.0419 0.1312 0.1237
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Manhattanville D3 UCHC SR 26 8 7 15 0.577
2021-22 Manhattanville D3 UCHC JR 14 2 2 4 0.286
2020-21 Manhattanville D1 SO 4 1 1 2 0.500
2020-21 Manhattanville D3 UCHC SO 4 1 1 2 0.500
2019-20 Manhattanville D1 FR 22 6 1 7 0.318
2019-20 Manhattanville D3 UCHC FR 22 6 1 7 0.318
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.32
2019-20 · Manhattanville
+265.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D1
22%
NCAA D2/D3
45%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#27326
Forward overall
#1338
Forward born in 1998

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Marian · 2018-19
0.308 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Finlandia · 2008-09
0.368 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Canton · 2021-22
0.360 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.