← New Search ↗ Social Card

Hayden Taylor Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-05-18 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Philadelphia Jr. Flyers EHL 48 24 13 37 0.771 0.1781 0.1882 0.3772 0.3987
2017-18 Islanders Hockey Club NCDC 48 18 22 40 0.833 0.3397 0.3378 0.6698 0.6660
2018-19 Lone Star Brahmas NAHL 16 1 1 2 0.125 0.0459 0.0433 0.1319 0.1244
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Manhattanville D3 UCHC SR 26 8 7 15 0.577
2021-22 Manhattanville D3 UCHC JR 14 2 2 4 0.286
2020-21 Manhattanville D1 UCHC SO 4 1 1 2 0.500
2020-21 Manhattanville D3 UCHC SO 4 1 1 2 0.500
2019-20 Manhattanville D1 UCHC FR 22 6 1 7 0.318
2019-20 Manhattanville D3 UCHC FR 22 6 1 7 0.318
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.32
2019-20 · Manhattanville
+130.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
22%
NCAA D2/D3
48%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#25038
Forward overall
#1223
Forward born in 1998

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

St. Michael's College · 2016-17
0.217 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Hamline · 2010-11
0.346 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Post · 2024-25
0.200 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.