IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

J.J. Berdal Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2000-02-15 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Hearst Lumberjacks NOJHL 39 6 13 19 0.487 0.0814 0.0822 0.2028 0.2048
2019-20 New Hampshire Jr. Monarchs NCDC 46 8 12 20 0.435 0.1773 0.1773 0.3495 0.3495
2020-21 Wausau Cyclones NA3HL 3 1 2 3 1.000 0.1255 0.1255 0.3157 0.3157
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Albertus Magnus D3 UCHC GR 16 1 3 4 0.250
2023-24 Albertus Magnus D3 UCHC SR 23 5 7 12 0.522
2022-23 Albertus Magnus D3 UCHC JR 14 2 3 5 0.357
2021-22 Albertus Magnus D3 UCHC SO 22 3 8 11 0.500
2020-21 Albertus Magnus D3 UCHC FR 1 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
78%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6635
Defenseman overall
#1354
Defenseman born in 2000

D1 Comparables

Sam Piazza
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Michigan (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Niklas Folin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Garret Cockerill
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Zach Frye
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Tim Davison
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Eric Bertelsen
Elmira · 2021-22
0.304 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Joseph Thielen
Curry · 2015-16
0.267 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Ray Nicks
Lebanon Valley · 2004-05
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.