IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ray Nicks Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1986-02-14 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2003-04 Nanaimo Clippers BCHL 8 1 3 4 0.500 0.1926 0.2043 0.7277 0.7721
2004-05 Trail Smoke Eaters BCHL 53 7 18 25 0.472 0.1817 0.1843 0.6865 0.6963
2005-06 Trail Smoke Eaters BCHL 57 12 13 25 0.439 0.1690 0.1629 0.6383 0.6154
2006-07 Quesnel Millionaires BCHL 45 6 15 21 0.467 0.1798 0.1637 0.6792 0.6184
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2010-11 Curry D3 CNE — 24 3 8 11 0.458
2009-10 Curry D3 CNE — 26 1 6 7 0.269
2008-09 Curry D3 CNE — 18 2 7 9 0.500
2007-08 Lebanon Valley D3 MAC — 25 4 7 11 0.440
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.44
2007-08 · Lebanon Valley
+214.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#33213
Forward overall
#1086
Forward born in 1986
#1859
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mack Heisinger
Curry · 2014-15
0.760 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Liam Board
Neumann · 2013-14
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Markus Andrews
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2023-24
0.300 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.