← New Search ↗ Social Card

Troy Quinn Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1999-05-29 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Kemptville 73's CCHL 0 0 0 0 0.000
2017-18 Cornwall Colts CCHL 43 3 2 5 0.116 0.0252 0.0257 0.0900 0.0918
2018-19 Swan Valley Stampeders MJHL 40 5 19 24 0.600 0.1155 0.1131 0.3781 0.3701
2019-20 Flin Flon Bombers SJHL 35 4 9 13 0.371 0.0952 0.0952 0.2752 0.2752
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC SR 15 0 1 1 0.067
2022-23 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC JR 22 1 2 3 0.136
2021-22 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC SO 26 1 7 8 0.308
2020-21 Wisconsin-Superior D1 BigTen FR 2 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Wisconsin-Superior D3 BigTen FR 2 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

40%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
30%
Age-Out / Club
25%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#12888
Defenseman overall
#2294
Defenseman born in 1999

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Providence (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.44 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Finlandia · 2018-19
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Plymouth State · 2023-24
0.852 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stout · 2014-15
0.741 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.