← New Search ↗ Social Card

Denys Arkhypenko Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-03-29 Country: Ukraine
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 WB/Scranton Knights EHL 41 5 17 22 0.537 0.0785 0.0859 0.2631 0.2880
2018-19 Wilkes-Barre/Scranton Knights NAHL 8 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Boston Dukes EHL 35 16 24 40 1.143 0.1672 0.1672
2020-21 Boston Dukes EHL 38 16 22 38 1.000 0.1463 0.1463 0.4903 0.4903
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 King's D3 MAC SR 23 3 3 6 0.261
2024-25 King's D3 MAC JR 8 2 0 2 0.250
2023-24 King's D3 MAC SO 23 4 4 8 0.348
2022-23 King's D3 MAC FR 24 7 4 11 0.458
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.46
2022-23 · King's
+493.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

0%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
100%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#11447
Forward overall
#471
Forward born in 2000
#141
in EHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Michigan (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Miami (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Bentley (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Superior · 2021-22
0.579 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2005-06
0.643 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Buffalo State · 2002-03
0.542 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.