IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brent Keefer Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-09-28 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Shreveport Mudbugs NAHL 39 10 6 16 0.410 0.1507 0.1507 0.4331 0.4331
2020-21 — NAHL 50 9 16 25 0.500 0.1837 0.1837 0.5278 0.5278
2021-22 Northeast Generals NAHL 52 19 28 47 0.904 0.3321 0.3199 0.9540 0.9191
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Army D1 AHA JR 35 6 9 15 0.429
2024-25 Army D1 AHA — 36 7 12 19 0.528
2023-24 Army D1 AHA — 34 13 11 24 0.706
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.27
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.71
2023-24 · Army
+157.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

62%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
22%
Age-Out / Club
8%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#19511
Forward overall
#931
Forward born in 2001
#1249
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sean Gaffney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
A.J. Reid
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jason Kenyon
Manhattanville · 2000-01
1.083 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Maxim Maziarchuk
Morrisville · 2023-24
0.684 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Drake Barnish
Utica · 2021-22
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.