IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Grant Johnson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-04-11 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Bismarck Bobcats NAHL 11 1 6 7 0.636 0.2338 0.2530 0.6717 0.7268
2017-18 Bismarck Bobcats NAHL 53 10 26 36 0.679 0.2495 0.2576 0.7169 0.7403
2018-19 Lincoln Stars USHL 53 3 4 7 0.132 0.0779 0.0740 0.3967 0.3768
2019-20 Bismarck Bobcats NAHL 48 14 29 43 0.896 0.3291 0.3291 0.9455 0.9455
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Northern Michigan D1 WCHA FR 1 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
15%
Age-Out / Club
60%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#21189
Forward overall
#1046
Forward born in 1999
#1478
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

William Messa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
Matthew Hansen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tobias Gabrielsen
St. Olaf · 2014-15
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Ricky Helmbrecht
Curry · 2004-05
1.333 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Ethan Finlason
UMass Dartmouth · 2021-22
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.