IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Alex Gomez Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-07-18 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 — NAHL 39 5 5 10 0.256 0.0911 0.0911 0.2692 0.2692
2020-21 New Mexico Ice Wolves NAHL 55 6 12 18 0.327 0.1163 0.1163 0.3436 0.3436
2021-22 New Mexico Ice Wolves NAHL 59 8 25 33 0.559 0.1987 0.1895 0.5872 0.5599
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Utica D3 UCHC — 14 0 3 3 0.214
2024-25 Alaska Anchorage D1 — — 16 0 5 5 0.312
2023-24 Alaska Anchorage D1 — — 23 1 3 4 0.174
2022-23 Alaska Anchorage D1 — — 24 2 2 4 0.167
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.17
2022-23 · Alaska Anchorage
2.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

40%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
50%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#33975
Forward overall
#1840
Forward born in 2001
#3286
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Garrett Hallford
Trine · 2017-18
0.960 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Zeke Hume
Manhattanville · 2003-04
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jack Sheehan
Framingham State · 2015-16
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.