IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Noah Bull Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-09-03 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Haliburton County Huskies OJHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2016-17 Haliburton County Huskies OJHL 39 1 5 6 0.154 0.0462 0.0498 0.1053 0.1134
2017-18 Haliburton County Huskies OJHL 54 4 13 17 0.315 0.0946 0.0974 0.2155 0.2218
2018-19 Haliburton County Huskies OJHL 54 13 21 34 0.630 0.1891 0.1854 0.4310 0.4225
2019-20 Corpus Christi IceRays NAHL 30 1 5 6 0.200 0.0792 0.0792 0.2100 0.2100
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC JR 17 0 1 1 0.059
2022-23 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC SO 23 5 4 9 0.391
2021-22 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC FR 12 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
35%
Age-Out / Club
32%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#37513
Forward overall
#2072
Forward born in 1999

D1 Comparables

Conor Andrle
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Army (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jake Wood
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ RPI (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Landon Smith
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.79 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Josh Erickson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Zach Saar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Penn State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Colby Nichol
Augsburg · 2003-04
0.850 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Alec Thieda
Norwich · 2009-10
0.654 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Polsinelli
Trinity · 2015-16
0.350 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.