IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

William Winship Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-10-25 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Islanders Hockey Club NCDC 48 15 22 37 0.771 0.3143 0.3329 0.6196 0.6563
2019-20 Corpus Christi IceRays NAHL 27 0 2 2 0.074 0.0272 0.0272 0.0782 0.0782
2020-21 Islanders Hockey Club NCDC 37 13 3 16 0.432 0.1763 0.1763 0.3476 0.3476
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Connecticut College D3 NESCAC SR 22 1 6 7 0.318
2023-24 Connecticut College D3 NESCAC JR 25 1 2 3 0.120
2022-23 Connecticut College D3 NESCAC SO 22 0 2 2 0.091
2021-22 Connecticut College D3 NESCAC FR 21 2 4 6 0.286
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.28
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.29
2021-22 · Connecticut College
0.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
85%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#24616
Forward overall
#1168
Forward born in 2000
#875
in NCDC

D1 Comparables

Mitch Hults
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jason Salvaggio
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Thomas Ebbing
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jake Jackson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.09 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tony Calderone
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.69 PPG
→ Michigan (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Bo Webster
Hobart · 2010-11
0.577 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Zach Tyson
Hobart · 2015-16
0.871 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Sam Ruffin
Adrian · 2016-17
1.276 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.