IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Bo Webster Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-10-27 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 Markham Waxers OJHL 35 6 7 13 0.371 0.1038 0.1174 0.2563 0.2898
2009-10 Milton Menace OJHL 48 9 21 30 0.625 0.1746 0.1883 0.4313 0.4650
2010-11 Milton Menace OJHL 48 17 38 55 1.146 0.3201 0.3302 0.7907 0.8158
2011-12 Milton Menace OJHL 48 19 45 64 1.333 0.3725 0.3678 0.9201 0.9086
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Hobart D3 SUNYAC GR 17 5 8 13 0.765
2015-16 Hobart D3 SUNYAC SR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2014-15 Hobart D3 SUNYAC JR 28 8 17 25 0.893
2013-14 Hobart D3 SUNYAC SO 27 6 17 23 0.852
2012-13 Hobart D3 SUNYAC FR 26 5 10 15 0.577
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.30
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.58
2012-13 · Hobart
+91.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#9709
Forward overall
#415
Forward born in 1992
#407
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Grant Opperman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.56 PPG
→ Dartmouth (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Strong
NCAAe PPG
A.J. Fossen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Villiam Haag
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Average
NCAAe PPG
Judd Peterson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Peter Krieger
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.92 PPG
→ Alaska (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Trever Hertz
Utica · 2008-09
0.808 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Nikita Kozyrev
Buffalo State · 2017-18
1.231 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Brett Penner
Concordia Wisconsin · 2011-12
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.