← New Search ↗ Social Card

Matthew Dougherty Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-11-15 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Philadelphia Jr. Flyers EHLP 41 16 15 31 0.756 0.0591 0.0602 0.1707 0.1737
2018-19 Richmond Generals USPHL-Elite 42 42 34 76 1.810 0.2170 0.2087 0.4155 0.3996
2019-20 Richmond Generals USPHL-Premier 44 24 27 51 1.159 0.1560 0.1560 0.3946 0.3946
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Western New England D3 CNE SR 17 5 5 10 0.588
2024-25 Western New England D3 CNE JR 19 4 7 11 0.579
2023-24 Western New England D3 CNE SO 24 3 9 12 0.500
2022-23 Western New England D3 CNE FR 26 7 15 22 0.846
2021-22 Stevenson D3 MAC 0 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Stevenson D3 MAC 6 2 1 3 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2020-21 · Stevenson
+291.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

50%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
32%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#27082
Forward overall
#1146
Forward born in 1999

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Union (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ RPI (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.79 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.08 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Becker · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Fitchburg State · 2014-15
0.357 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Chatham · 2021-22
0.438 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.