IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ian Hofmann Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-11-22 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Richmond Generals USPHL-Elite 43 15 22 37 0.861 0.0794 0.0801 0.1971 0.1988
2018-19 Richmond Generals USPHL-Premier 39 13 13 26 0.667 0.0872 0.0878 0.2263 0.2278
2019-20 Richmond Generals USPHL-Premier 41 9 19 28 0.683 0.0893 0.0893 0.2318 0.2318
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Worcester State D3 MASCAC — 0 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Worcester State D3 MASCAC — 6 1 1 2 0.333
2020-21 Becker D3 — FR 2 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
40%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#27366
Forward overall
#1410
Forward born in 1999

D1 Comparables

Sebastian Weberg
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Colgate
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Hynes
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Union (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Canon Pieper
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.08 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Austin Vieth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Gareau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Todd Jackson
Norwich · 2014-15
0.379 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Alexis Billequey
Trinity · 2023-24
0.214 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Jeremy DeFazio
SUNY Brockport · 2010-11
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.