IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jeremy DeFazio Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1991-11-22 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Bramalea Blues OJHL 53 3 14 17 0.321 0.0896 0.0924 0.2214 0.2284
2010-11 Burlington Cougars OJHL 42 7 15 22 0.524 0.1463 0.1441 0.3615 0.3561
2011-12 Georgetown Raiders OJHL 49 3 12 15 0.306 0.0855 0.0805 0.2112 0.1987
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 SUNY Brockport D3 — SR 24 2 4 6 0.250
2014-15 SUNY Brockport D3 — JR 24 5 9 14 0.583
2013-14 SUNY Brockport D3 — SO 25 1 4 5 0.200
2012-13 SUNY Brockport D3 — FR 25 4 7 11 0.440
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.44
2012-13 · SUNY Brockport
+385.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#36757
Forward overall
#1418
Forward born in 1991
#3530
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Nick DeCenzo
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Army (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Dau
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Air Force (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Petr Miko
Nichols · 2017-18
0.346 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Devin Lowe
Suffolk · 2018-19
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Kyle Bauer
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2022-23
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.