IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Devin Lowe Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-11-28 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Connecticut Jr. Rangers NCDC 31 1 6 7 0.226 0.0636 0.0649 0.1828 0.1866
2018-19 — NCDC 41 4 13 17 0.415 0.1168 0.1126 0.3357 0.3236
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Suffolk D3 CNE GR 25 4 15 19 0.760
2022-23 Suffolk D3 CNE SR 25 5 5 10 0.400
2021-22 Suffolk D3 CNE JR 25 7 13 20 0.800
2020-21 Suffolk D3 CNE SO 2 1 0 1 0.500
2019-20 Suffolk D3 CNE FR 25 4 8 12 0.480
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.48
2019-20 · Suffolk
+499.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

40%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#39378
Forward overall
#1807
Forward born in 1998
#1090
in NCDC

D1 Comparables

Nick DeCenzo
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Army (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Evan Ritt
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Denver
0.24 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Doucet
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Micky Knox
Wisconsin-Stout · 2010-11
0.429 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Eric Manoukian
Endicott · 2018-19
0.706 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Isaiah Bennis
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2008-09
0.593 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.