IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Eric Manoukian Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1998-12-09 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 New Jersey Jr. Titans NAHL 47 4 11 15 0.319 0.1185 0.1204 0.3379 0.3432
2018-19 New Jersey Jr. Titans NAHL 46 4 17 21 0.457 0.1695 0.1646 0.4833 0.4693
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Endicott D3 CNE SR 10 0 1 1 0.100
2021-22 Endicott D3 CNE JR 23 3 12 15 0.652
2020-21 Endicott D3 CNE SO 3 0 4 4 1.333
2019-20 Endicott D3 CNE FR 17 2 10 12 0.706
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.71
2019-20 · Endicott
+408.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
30%
NCAA D2/D3
38%
Age-Out / Club
10%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#7234
Defenseman overall
#1181
Defenseman born in 1998
#3241
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.19 No data
NCAAe PPG
Garret Peterson
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.35 PPG
→ Army (0.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Taki Pantziris
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.16 No data
NCAAe PPG
Nolan Valleau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.49 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Bryan Gallagher
Marian · 2003-04
1.037 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Camden Markham
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2024-25
0.583 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Eliot Grauer
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2012-13
0.583 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.