IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Chase Carney Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-12-14 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Worcester Jr. Railers EHL 45 6 14 20 0.444 0.0650 0.0678 0.2179 0.2272
2023-24 Worcester Jr. Railers EHL 45 7 14 21 0.467 0.0683 0.0678 0.2288 0.2270
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Keene State D3 LittleEast SO 25 9 9 18 0.720
2024-25 Keene State D3 LittleEast — 24 12 12 24 1.000
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.06
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.00
2024-25 · Keene State
+1624.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#34676
Forward overall
#2114
Forward born in 2003
#1253
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Primo Self
Endicott · 2021-22
0.682 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Dan Sherer
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2011-12
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Andrew Johnston
SUNY Brockport · 2003-04
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.